Peer-Review Process
Ensuring scientific rigor and quality through independent double-blind evaluation
All submissions to the Annual Session of Scientific Papers IMT Oradea 2027 undergo a rigorous peer-review process to guarantee their technical quality, academic integrity, and relevance to the conference research areas.
Review Policy & Guidelines
To maintain objectivity, the conference operates a Double-Blind Peer Review policy. Under this system, the identity of both the authors and the reviewers remains anonymous throughout the process. Authors are requested to remove all identifying information (names, affiliations, and self-referencing citations) from the initial manuscript submission files.
Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers evaluate submitted manuscripts based on the following key metrics:
- Scientific Quality: The contribution must present sound methodologies, accurate data, and logical arguments.
- Originality: The paper must present original research findings, unique case studies, or innovative technological solutions.
- Relevance: The topic must align closely with one or more of the conference's Key Research Areas.
- Clarity: The manuscript must be clearly written in grammatically correct English and follow standard academic presentation structures.
Peer-Review Workflow Pipeline
Submission
Author submits anonymized manuscript in Word format before the deadline.
Initial Screening
Editors verify format, topic relevance, and perform anti-plagiarism checks.
Double-Blind Peer Review
At least two independent experts review the paper and submit evaluations.
Decision & Revision
Authors receive review feedback to submit required manuscript updates.
Final Approval
Editors review final camera-ready copy for inclusion in the proceedings.